| 10 minutes with …Stanley Hauerwas |
| Written by Kevin Eckstrom | ||
| Monday, 07 December 2009 00:00 | ||
|
DURHAM, N.C. (RNS) Remember that book How to Win Friends and Influence People? Let’s just say that Duke University ethicist Stanley Hauerwas has been hugely influential, but that doesn’t mean his salty tongue has made him a lot of friends along the way. Hauerwas, a self-described Christian pacifist, is an expert on just war theory. As Hauerwas sees it, not only did Iraq and Afghanistan fail to meet the criteria of a just war, but neither did World War II. As the Obama administration has weighed its options in Afghanistan, Hauerwas remains decidedly pessimistic not only about American prospects, but also American morality. Hauerwas, 69, talked about his view on war and peace, his dismal assessment about the state of America’s churches, and why President Barack Obama isn’t likely to come calling. Some answers have been edited for length and clarity. KE: What should President Obama do about Afghanistan? SH: Afghanistan was understood to be part of the war against terror, and that was a decisive mistake because as soon as you said we are at war, you gave Osama bin Laden what he wanted — he became a warrior, and not just a murderer. I would be much happier with a whole reconsideration of our involvement there — not as a war, but as a police function, and how the police might intervene to arrest bin Laden. I know that sounds utopian, but just try thinking you’re going to win a war in Afghanistan. I can’t imagine anything more utopian than that. … KE: With seven years of hindsight, was Afghanistan ever a just war? SH: Afghanistan has the possibility of being limited in a way that might make it a bit more justifiable, but it’s still not clear what we’re fighting for. The very idea that you begin to assess the justness of a war after the war is already going to happen, I’m sorry, it’s already too late. KE: How would you assess the church’s response to the Iraq war? SH: Awful. Christians — and it started with Sept. 11, as soon as we said we are at war — Christians said “that’s us.” We never asked the hard questions about the war on terror, and that is, I think, why Iraq happened. It has everything to do with the inability to distinguish between the Christian “we” and the American “we.” KE: So does the church need a service of repentance? SH: The church has lost its ability to be a disciplined community because we’re now, religiously, in a buyer’s market. Christianity has to bill itself as very good for your self-realization, and that’s killing us because we’re not very good for your self-realization. We’re good for your salvation, which is not the same thing. Hopefully God is making sure that we’re not going to survive in the position we’re currently in. KE: What kinds of questions should we be asking now about Afghanistan? SH: We need to ask them to tell us the truth. Tell us that we’re engaged in an unwinnable business here, but we have these kinds of political stakes and we want to achieve those, and people are going to die for ambiguous political ends. Just tell us the truth. KE: What should be the church’s role in the debate over Afghanistan? SH: Let’s start with people in our congregations who are connected with the military, and ask them how they can justify that. Let’s start there. I have high regard for people in the military, but very seldom are they asked to justify what they’re doing. KE: So every Christian is called to be a pacifist? SH: Yes, absolutely. KE: So how do you respond to people who say that’s unrealistic? SH: Try lifelong monogamous fidelity in marriage. Do you think that’s realistic? Yet we do it. I’m not terribly cowed by the charge of being unrealistic. KE: If Obama were to call you for advice on Afghanistan, what would you say? SH: I’d say you have to tell the American some really hard truths, namely that the war on terror was a mistake and we’ve got to start, as Americans, learning to live in a world that we don’t control. That’s not going to make you very popular. KE: So you’d be politically toxic to the president of the United States? SH: Yeah, I would be. Just like (former Obama pastor) Jeremiah Wright. I hope I’m absolutely as toxic as Jeremiah Wright. KE: Why? SH: Because I think what I’m saying is what Christians should be saying. KE: The hard truths? SH: Absolutely. Your Responses (1)
Ann Williamson Young, H.R.
said:
|
Subscribe to this comment's feed
|
Cornelius, N.C. It was such a joy to read the interview with Dr. Hauerwas … . Finally, a leader who dares to speak truth to the powers, both political and religious, and who calls us all to have the courage to speak honestly about hard issues. It reminds me of a time in our church life when there were "giants in the land," as one has said. I think often of the question: Where is Reinhold Niebuhr when we need him? And in politics, dare I say - we need those who will remind us of such principles that we have no need to fear, but fear itself. That still holds true. We are victims of our own fears, and those imposed on us by some who promote it to intimidate and control. From big business, to the Town Hall, from local parishes to inter-religious warfare, from Congress, Pentagon, and White House, we long for informed integrity, honesty, and forthright statements about the realities and possible solutions for our life together. We need leadership in all levels who dare to speak truth as they see it, regardless of the political or religious repercussions. Hauerwas is so right, in my opinion, in saying "the church has lost its ability to be a disciplined community because we're now in a buyers' market." Just as politicians at all levels are to afraid to speak truthfully, lest they not get elected next time around, so pastors and church leaders seem to fear holding up the call to serious discipleship, lest membership drop, budgets fail, and jobs are lost. We call on Afghanistan to correct their corruption at every level, yet our leaders in the U.S. are daily in the news with charges of taking bribes, personal misconduct, infidelity, secret memos, and private deals for their constituents, which undermine any public trust in the body politic. Where has truth telling gone? Churches are no less mired in internal bickering, priestly misconduct, bogged down in theological nit-picking, while not attending sufficiently to the big issues of loving enemies, making peace, not war, feeding the hungry, and taking care of the millions who are starving, brutalized, imprisoned unfairly and left unheard and unseen. So, I say amen to Hauerwas' call for truth telling. There was a day when religious and political leaders could "tell it like it is" (in each's humble opinion), and so beckon a nation to rise to its potential strength, deal with the troubles with courage, equanimity, and trust in the better side of humanity. We seem to have lost the desire to seek solutions for the whole, not just the few. This is one of those times as never before when truth telling to power is desperately needed. The Church could be leading the way on this, even if we died trying. I wonder if we are up to it? |
Write a Response
