Google+
RE: Assembly stops short of the brink on same-gender marriage
Written by Proctor Chambless   
Monday, 23 July 2012 23:39

Wondered if anyone has ever considered making the same-sex marriage more of a "local option?"  There would be a series of questions that would be addressed:
1. Is same-sex marriage legal in your state?  If not, query is over.
2. If same-sex marriage is legal in your state, then each presbytery within that state would address the matter for their churches and ministers.  If they vote "No", query is over.
3.  If the presbytery approves same-sex marriage, then each Session addresses the matter for their own church.  If they do not approve, query over.
4.  If the local Session does approve, then the last one with a scrupple will be the pastor of that church.  No pastor should be asked to do ANY wedding that he or she does not feel should take place.

Just an idea for discussion.

Peace,

Proctor Chambless
First Presbyterian Churcn - Springfield, TN

 

Comments  

 
#2 Reverend Patricia Slomanski 2012-10-12 21:41
"Wondered if anyone ever considered what God's Word says about homosexuality?" It is not a "local option!"
Quote
 
 
#1 D. Mounger 2012-07-29 13:18
"Local option" is a great idea, if all will agree to it. Some of us are old enough to remember a time when, in the old PCUS (before the 1970s schism by the PCA) when if one could not, in good conscience, affirm the full and literal, historical existence of a man named "Adam" and a woman named "Eve," one knew to avoid accepting a pastoral call to certain presbyteries in Alabama and Mississippi (and perhaps elsewhere). One looked for more accepting presbytery pastures. How tragic that we Presbyterians don't learn from our own history! For example, before the Civil War James H. Thornwell of South Carolina and Charles Hodge of Princeton conspired to keep the topic of slavery totally off the floor of the General Assembly, so that Old School Presbyterians were able to stay united until after Fort Sumter. Slavery was evil, of course; in doing so they snubbed God's call for Christians to stand against injustice and for freedom for all. But the strategy was smart, if one wanted to keep the denomination intact. Quarreling over--even wondering about--who may be sleeping with whom, that has characterized so many of our ecclesiastical meetings for the past 50 years, has been the laughing Evil One's clever means of dismembering and further fragmenting the very Body of Christ. After Harry E. Fosdick's sermon "Shall the Fundamentalists Win?" the consequent Auburn Affirmation's declaring belief in the virginal conception of Christ as unimportant, and "das Madchen's" formenting of the OPC and Westminster Seminary, the good and faithful who remained in the former PCUSA united enthusiasticall y around MISSION. Can't we put sex of all varieties on the shelf now as a topic--and quit obsessing about it? Let's all unite in 1,001 new and innovative worshiping communities, and in effective evangelism of all the world!
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh