<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Seeing gay and lesbian relationships through new lens</title>
		<description>Comments for Seeing gay and lesbian relationships through new lens at http://www.pres-outlook.com , comment 1 to 1 out of 1 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.pres-outlook.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 02:41:58 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Sincerity? ...</title>
			<link>http://www.pres-outlook.com/news-and-analysis/1-news-a-analysis/8116-seeing-gay-and-lesbian-relationships-through-new-lens.html#comment-4187</link>
			<description>William Stacey Johnson brings many good gifts &amp; insights to understanding how the PC(USA) can be more of a welcoming and affirming denomination of LGBT persons &amp; their gospel-reflected relationships.

That being said, I must say that I have never heard a liberal in the denomination begin sexual morality discussions with what Johnson mentions, to wit: &quot;Is this relationship sincere?&quot; I have often heard liberals begin with, &quot;Is this relationship loving and just?&quot; -- but never &quot;sincere&quot;.

Maybe this self-confessed liberal has missed it, but I must ask: Where have liberals in the church -- or any other group, for that matter? -- elevated sincerity to such a privileged place in the pantheon of Christian virtues? 

At the risk of putting too fine a point on the matter: I think we all understand that Adolf Hitler was sincere. - (Rev.) Charles Booker-Hirsch</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:24:52 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
