Become our Friend on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Font Size: +A -A RESET

the Outlook Blog

YOU ARE INVITED to participate in the Outlook Blog! This blog presents an ongoing opportunity for dialogue on matters of faith, theology, and ethics. You must be logged in to post, and our goal is to have this blog moderated by its users. Please direct questions concerning this blog to the webmaster via our Contact Us page.

Tag >> Middle East

Well, at least the New York Times does. Yesterday morning I was sitting in the Peacemaking and International Issues Committee, as they discussed and passed recommendations related to issues in Zimbabwe, Columbia, North Korea and Israel/Palestine. I was sitting between a reporter from the New York Sun (article here) and the New York Times. I'll have to admit, I was a little surprised to see a New York Times reporter covering a Presbyterian committee meeting. Perhaps that's just the part of me that wonders if anyone outside of the PC(USA) really cares what is going on here in San Jose this week. But it did remind me that there are folks, outside of the Presbyterian Church (USA), who are interested in what official statements come from the 218th General Assembly.

I have many friends who are even more cynical than I am concerning the significance of events like this, and seriously question the form of government and bureaucracy that exists in our denomination. I am equally as skeptical about our bureaucracy at times, and find it very frustrating as I sit through these committee meetings, hearing motions, amendments, substitute amendments and substitute motions made. But there is one thing I have found today: there is a host of people in our denomination who are passionate and committed to this church and care about a variety of issues within the church and in our world.

I sat in the Peacemaking committee and heard pastors, elders, activists and world leaders give impassioned pleas for voting for or against certain overtures related to Israel and Palestine. There were over 70 people who wanted to speak on the issue - both Presbyterians and others who came to lobby for their cause, including His Eminence Elias Chacour, Archbishop of the Melkite Catholic Church of Israel, and representatives from Jewish Voice for Peace, the Anti-Defamation League, the Simon Wiesenthal Center, the Committee to End Divestment Now and many other groups. If what the Presbyterian Church said about these important issues and policies meant nothing, why would people like this show up? Why would it even matter?

As much as I get frustrated by Robert's Rules, and the way in which committees have to make these decisions (and I haven't even gotten to the plenary discussions that start today...), there is also part of me that has to realize that to at least some degree, what we say, what we proclaim, does make a difference. And that is why events such as the 218th General Assembly matter. Because, at least some people do care what the PC(USA) thinks.

I'm sure if you ask anyone at GA, they will have their own version of what the really important "issues" at GA are going to be. And you'll probably find that what might be a really huge issue for some may not be that important to others. This is important to remember as we engage in debate and dialogue during this upcoming week. For myself, there are a few issues that I'll be following with some interest. I spent the summer of 2005 in the Middle East, primarily living just outside of Bethlehem, in the Occupied Territories. Because of my experiences there, I am very interested in the work of the Mission Responsibility Through Investment Committee (MRTI), the overtures that discuss how the PC(USA) will work towards peace in the Middle East and the overtures that discuss the relationship between Christians and Muslims. This is actually one of the first years that we have invited interfaith representatives to be a part of the General Assembly, and I hope we will listen to their important voices. I will also be following the overtures and discussions about sexuality issues related to ordination, as they unfortunately seem to be at the root of a good portion of our denominational divisions.

On the GA website, the PC(USA) has posted their own version of the Top 10 Issues at GA this week. They have listed the following issues as the top ten:

  1. A revised Form of Government

  2. Partnership in World Mission

  3. PC(USA) ecumenical stance and covenants

  4. Peace, unity and purity of the PC(USA)

  5. The Belhar Confession

  6. Middle East concerns

  7. Elections
  8. 
Growing God’s Church Deep and Wide

  9. Domestic social justice concerns

  10. A church for future generations

As you read this post, and look at the issues listed by the PC(USA), what stands out to you as most important? What are your top issues for this week?


Banner
Join Our News Alerts Mailing List
Email:
Banner
Banner
Banner